|
THE STATE
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 |
TO: |
Higher Education and Professional Practice Committee |
|
FROM: |
Richard P. Mills |
|
SUBJECT: |
Regents Accreditation of Teacher Education
Recommendation of Accreditation Action: Elmira College
|
|
DATE: |
November 15, 2006 |
|
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
Goals 1, 2,
and 3
|
|
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
Issue for
Decision
Elmira College has applied for Regents
accreditation of its teacher education programs in Visual Arts and in Speech and
Language Disabilities. Should the
Board of Regents accredit these programs?
Reason(s) for
Consideration
Required by State
regulation.
Proposed
Handling
The question will
come before the Higher Education and Professional Practice Committee at its
December 2006 meeting, where it will be voted on and action taken. It will then come before the full Board
at its December 2006 meeting for final action.
Procedural
History
The Board of
Regents adopted a new teaching policy, "Teaching to Higher Standards: New York’s Commitment," in 1998. As a result of that policy, in 1999 the
Board adopted section 52.21(b)(2)(iv)(c)(1) of the Commissioner’s Regulations,
which requires New
York State
teacher education programs to become accredited by an acceptable accrediting
organization.
Background
Information
Elmira College has applied for accreditation of
its Visual Arts and Speech and Language Disabilities teacher education programs
by Regents Accreditation of Teacher Education (RATE). At its June 2006 meeting, the Board
accredited with conditions for three years the 30 other teacher education
programs offered by Elmira College. At that time, the College was in the process
of appealing the Deputy Commissioner's recommendation for denial of
accreditation for the Visual Arts (B.A.) and Speech and Language Disabilities
(B.A. and B.S.) teacher education programs. Following a review of information
provided by the institution in response to the Deputy Commissioner's initial
recommendation, the Department now submits the Visual Arts and Speech and
Language Disabilities teacher education programs to the Board for review and
action.
Accreditation Review Process
The accreditation review process for the teacher education programs at
Elmira
College consisted of the
following steps:
- College prepared its Self
Study;
- RATE team conducted the site
visit;
- The College responded to the site visit
team's report;
- The Higher Education Subcommittee of the
State Professional Standards and Practices Board for Teaching (PSPB) reviewed
the site visit team report, the College's response, and the Department's
preliminary recommendation and recommended accreditation of the teacher
education programs, with the exception of those in Visual Arts and in
Speech and Language Disabilities;
- The Deputy Commissioner reviewed all
materials and recommended accreditation of all teacher education programs,
with the exception of those in Visual Arts and in Speech and Language
Disabilities;
- The College appealed the Deputy
Commissioner's recommendation for denial of the teacher education programs in
Visual Arts and in Speech and Language Disabilities;
- At
its June 2006 meeting, the Board accredited with conditions for three years
the teacher education programs offered by Elmira College, as recommended by the Deputy
Commissioner;
- The
Visual Arts and Speech and Language Disabilities teacher education programs
were not submitted for review or action at the June 2006 Regents meeting, as
Elmira prepared its appeal in support of those programs; and
- The Deputy
Commissioner reviewed the College's appeal materials and, based on those
materials, now recommends that the Visual Arts and Speech and Language
Disabilities teacher education programs be accredited
with conditions.
A RATE team
visited Elmira
College from March 20 - 23,
2005 as part of the accreditation review process. The team reviewed documents; visited
classrooms; inspected facilities and resources; interviewed administrators,
department chairs and faculty, current and former students, and cooperating
teachers; and attended various staff and department meetings. The RATE team's concerns about
the Visual Arts and Speech and Language Disabilities teacher education programs
included the following:
- The
majority of credit-bearing pedagogical core courses were not taught by
full-time faculty (Visual Arts).
- Lack
of a full-time faculty member with a doctoral degree in the Speech and
Language Disabilities programs.
- No
program assessment data.
- Little evidence of collaboration between
Education and Liberal Arts and Sciences faculty members.
At its March
23, 2006 meeting, the Higher Education Subcommittee of the PSPB recommended that
the Visual Arts and the Speech and Language Disabilities programs be denied
accreditation. After reviewing
the Subcommittee's recommendation and the entire record of the accreditation
process, Deputy Commissioner Duncan-Poitier recommended denial of accreditation
of those programs. The institution
notified the Department of its intention to appeal that recommendation, and it
followed up in August 2006 with its appeal materials and clarifying
information.
The College's
appeal materials, in tandem with the actions required by the conditions attached
to the June 2006 accreditation of the institution's 30 other teacher education
programs, address the issues identified by the RATE team, PSPB, and Deputy
Commissioner as follows:
- The
College provided a term-by-term breakdown of the percentage of credit-bearing
pedagogical core courses taught by full-time faculty in the Visual Arts
program from 2003 through 2006.
- The
College explained the difficulty of
hiring a full-time faculty staff person with a doctoral degree due to the
documented shortage of doctorally-prepared candidates in Speech Pathology, the
high need of the Speech and Language Disabilities programs, and the
qualifications and special competencies of faculty members in the Speech and
Language Disabilities programs.
Based on their competencies
and qualifications, those faculty members are acceptable.
- The lack of program assessment data and
evidence of collaboration between Education and Liberal Arts and
Sciences faculty members was cited for all of the institution's teacher
education programs, including those accredited with conditions at the June
2006 Regents meeting. In keeping
with the conditions of the June accreditation action, the College submitted a
compliance work plan that specifies actions to address all issues, including
program assessment and faculty collaboration. Efforts to date include the
installation of a database intended to capture, organize, and process all
assessment-related teacher education data. The source of that data will be
rubrics, surveys, and other instruments identified in the compliance work
plan. The plan is under review
and has been shared with the PSPB.
Based on the
College’s August 2006 appeal materials and in consideration of the compliance
work plan required by the June 2006 accreditation action, the Deputy
Commissioner now recommends accreditation for three years of the Visual Arts and
the Speech and Language Disabilities teacher education programs, with the
following conditions:
1.
For each semester beginning with spring 2007, a
majority of the credit-bearing pedagogical core courses in the Visual Arts
program must be taught by full-time faculty;
2.
The College must hire a doctorally-prepared,
full-time faculty staff person in Speech and Language Disabilities or a related
field within the three-year period; and
3.
The Annual Report will provide information on the
methods and outcomes of assessing graduate effectiveness and candidate
achievements in the Visual Arts and the Speech and Language Disabilities
programs.
I concur with the Deputy
Commissioner's recommendation.
Recommendation
Consistent
with the recommendation of Deputy Commissioner Duncan-Poitier, it is recommended
that the Board of Regents accredit with conditions for three years the teacher
education programs in Visual Arts and in Speech and Language Disabilities
offered by Elmira
College. Accreditation will be effective December
5, 2006 for a period beginning immediately and ending on December 4, 2009, under
the conditions specified by the Deputy Commissioner.