THE STATE
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 |
TO:
Full Board
FROM:
James A. Kadamus
SUBJECT:
Proposal on Graduation Standard
DATE:
May 31, 2005
STRATEGIC
GOAL:
Goals 1 and 2
AUTHORIZATION(S):
Summary
Issue for
Decision
Should the Regents approve the proposal to phase-in the graduation
standard of 65 on required Regents exams?
Revision of policy.
Proposed
Handling
The Regents EMSC-VESID Committee continued discussion of a modified
proposal at its May meeting and reached consensus that it would recommend
approval to the Full Board in June.
Procedural
History
In October 2003, the Board voted to extend the 55-64 low-pass option for
two years. Currently, general
education students entering grade 9 in September 2005 will be required to attain
a 65 passing score on all required Regents exams in order to graduate. The
Regents EMSC-VESID Committee has reviewed student performance data and discussed
implementation of a high school completion initiative focused on 136 high
schools with graduation rates less than 70 percent. This information has also helped to
inform the Board as it considers whether to revise its policy on the graduation
standard.
In March 2005, the Committee reviewed a draft
proposal developed by the Co-Chairs to phase-in the 65 graduation standard. A new proposal was developed for
discussion in April that incorporated modifications suggested by Committee
members at the March meeting. The
May proposal included a revision proposed by the Co-Chairs and other
modifications requested by Committee members at the April
meeting.
The June proposal has been modified to clarify that (1) the proposal
represents a minimum phase-in period and school districts may implement the
schedule at a faster pace in accordance with policy established by the local
board of education; and (2) all school districts must provide students with the
opportunity to apply for the appeals process if they meet the eligibility
criteria. In addition, the
Commissioner’s advisory group of school administrators has recommended that an
application for the appeals process be reviewed and decided on within 10 rather
than 5 days of its receipt. The
school administrators indicated that a longer time period is needed to
adequately review and make a decision on an application, especially if such a
review is requested near the end of a school year.
Background
Information
The proposal on the graduation standard reviewed by
the Committee in March used a phase-in schedule for averaging the passing scores
on the required Regents exams for general education students entering grade 9 in
September 2005. The proposal
discussed by the Committee in April and May eliminated averaging of the scores
on the Regents exams. Instead, it
specified how many of the five required exams students must score 65 or above
since data showed a minimal difference between averaging and requiring a score
of 65 on a certain number of exams (see Attachment A).
The Regents EMSC-VESID Committee reached consensus in May to recommend
that the Full Board approve the attached proposal that phases in the 65
graduation standard as follows:
This proposal will not only
allow time for schools to phase in the 65 passing requirement, but also sets out
clear expectations for schools and students. Attachment B presents the revised
diploma requirements based on this proposal.
The proposal also establishes an appeals process, beginning with students
entering grade 9 in 2005, for students who score within three points of 65 on a
required Regents exam for graduation and have a 65 course average. The student must have taken and been
unsuccessful on the Regents exam in question two times and meet the criteria
identified in the attached to demonstrate that they meet the State learning
standards.
Recommendation
VOTED: That the Board of
Regents approve the proposal to phase in the 65 graduation standard and to
establish an appeals process as described in the attached proposal, effective
September 1, 2005, and direct staff to proceed with developing the necessary
amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner to implement the revision to
current policy.
Timetable for
Implementation
The proposed amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner will be
submitted to the Regents in July for emergency adoption so that they will be in
effect by the beginning of the 2005-06 school year.
Attachment
Proposal on Graduation
Standard
By the Co-Chairs and Members of the Regents
EMSC-VESID Committee
Since December 2004, the Regents have been reviewing data on the
performance after four years of high school of a cohort of students who entered
grade 9 in September 2000. The
statewide results of the School Report Cards released on March 9, 2005, provide
even more detailed information on student performance. After reviewing the data, the Regents
conclude the following:
These trends provide compelling evidence that the
public school system has made significant improvements since 1996, and it is
important to continue this progress by raising graduation passing standards from
55 to 65 on Regents exams.
There are, however, additional data, recently made
available as a result of the new student information system, that suggests that
meeting higher graduation standards will be a significant challenge to some
students in the highest need school districts, specifically those in the large
five city districts:
·
Students overwhelmingly
pass Regents exams if they take them.
But too many students in high need districts enter high school unprepared
for high school work, fail their courses and are held back. In the highest need districts, high
percentages of students don’t pass their courses and therefore don’t take
Regents exams, which are end-of-course tests, during four years of high
school.
·
The graduation rates
for minority students, who go to school in the highest need districts, are much
lower than that for white students.
We can identify the
students in academic difficulty and the schools they attend. Our data show that these students are
concentrated in 136 high schools in 12 school districts. In January and February, the Regents
EMSC-VESID Committee identified high school intervention strategies that build
upon current Regents strategies, such as the statewide urban district strategy,
and our own experience in working with urban districts. The high school intervention strategies
include:
·
Requiring all schools
to identify all the students in academic difficulty, to notify the parents, and
to report what they are doing to help these students succeed;
and
·
Expanding and
strengthening our statewide initiative with the high schools that have the
lowest graduation rates and the highest proportions of students taking three or
fewer Regents exams in four years by bringing the 12 school districts together
to evaluate and implement strategies to improve graduation rates and performance
on Regents exams. This strategy is
being implemented through two meetings with all of these districts. One was held March 21-22 in Albany and a
second is scheduled for May 23-24 in New York City.
In addition to these high school intervention
strategies, it is important to continue progress in raising the graduation
standard from 55 to 65 on Regents exams.
Therefore, we propose the following to implement the higher graduation
standard:
The passing score on the five required Regents exams for graduation will
be raised according to the following schedule:
This schedule represents a minimum phase-in period
and school districts may implement the schedule at a faster pace in accordance
with policy established by the local board of education. It not only allows adequate time for
schools and students to phase in the 65 passing requirement, but also sets out
the expected level of achievement for schools and students. Attachment B presents the revised
diploma requirements based on this proposal.
During the first three cohorts of the phase-in (2005,
2006 and 2007), students who do not score 65 on all exams will receive a local
diploma. Students who score 65 on
all five exams will receive a Regents diploma. Students who score 65 on eight exams
will receive an Advanced Regents Diploma.
The Regents Competency Test safety net for students with disabilities
will continue to be available for students entering grade 9 prior to September
2010. Students using the safety net
will receive a local diploma. The
low-pass option of scoring between 55-64 on the required Regents exams to earn a
local diploma will continue to be available for students with
disabilities.
In addition, we propose that, beginning with students
entering grade 9 in 2005, an appeals process be created for students who score
within three points of 65 on a required Regents exam for graduation and have a
65 course average. An appeal may be
initiated by a student or by the student's parent/guardian or teacher on his/her
behalf. Some students may achieve
the State standards as demonstrated through their coursework even though they
may not have access to resources comparable to their peers in other
schools. Some students may have
multiple teachers in a subject area during the school year and may have less
access to up-to-date instructional materials, technology and laboratories. The Regents believe these students
should be considered for the appeals process assuming they meet the criteria set
out below. School districts must
provide all students with the opportunity to access the appeals process if they
meet the eligibility requirements.
Students seeking an appeal must meet the following
criteria to demonstrate that they meet the State learning
standards:
1.
Take the Regents exam
in question two times.
2.
Have a score on the
Regents exam under appeal within 3 points of the 65 passing score on that
exam.
3.
Present evidence that
they have taken advantage of academic help provided by the school in the subject
tested by the Regents exam under appeal.
4.
Have an attendance rate
of 95 percent for the school year (except for excused absences) during which
they last took the Regents exam under appeal. Local school districts set their own
policy for what is considered an excused or unexcused
absence.
5.
Have a course average
in the subject under appeal that meets or exceeds the required passing grade by
the school. The course average must
be based on the student's official transcript that records grades achieved by
the student in each quarter of the school year.
6.
Be recommended for an
exemption to the graduation requirement by their teacher or Department
chairperson in the subject of the Regents exam under
appeal.
Students who meet all of these criteria would be eligible to apply to their school principal on a form to be developed by the Commissioner of Education. The principal would chair a standing committee of three teachers (not including the teacher of the student making the appeal) and two administrators (the principal and one other) that would review all appeals and rule on them within 10 days of submission. The committee may, in its discretion, interview the teacher or Department chairperson
recommending the appeal. The committee may interview the student making the appeal to determine that the student has demonstrated the knowledge and skills required under the State learning standards. The school superintendent, or Chancellor in New York City or his/her designee, shall sign off on all appeals. The school superintendent, or Chancellor in New York City or his/her designee, may interview the student making the appeal to determine that the student has demonstrated the knowledge and skills required under the State learning standards.
Students may be considered for an appeal on two of the five required Regents exams. Students who are granted an appeal on two exams will receive a local diploma. Students who are granted an appeal on one exam will be determined to have met all graduation requirements, and thereby earn a Regents diploma.
The school will make a record of all appeals received
and granted and report this information to the State Education Department. The record of appeals will appear on the
School Report Card. All school
records relating to appeals of Regents exams must be available for inspection by
the State Education Department.
These proposals in combination:
·
Create a clearly
defined four-year schedule for raising the graduation standard to 65 on Regents
exams;
·
Recognize that some
students have strengths in certain subjects and rewards them for higher
performance on certain exams;
·
Provide a reasonable
process to take into consideration the successful coursework of students who
score within a few points of passing a Regents exam;
·
Provide students with
unlimited opportunities to retake the required Regents exams to improve their
scores;
·
Give a reasonable time
period for the highest need districts to continue to build district
instructional capacity to ensure that all students take and pass the Regents
exams at the 65 proficiency level; and
·
Provide a clear
strategy for improving academic achievement for students in those high schools
that have the lowest four-year graduation rates.
Attachment A
Number and Percentage of General-Education Students Who First Entered Grade 9 in 2000 Meeting Various Regents Examination Score Requirements
Regents Exam Scores |
Total State |
New York City | ||
Number of students |
Percentage of students |
Number of students |
Percentage of
students | |
General-education
students with scores on five exams |
130,924* |
|
36,456 |
|
General-education
students with scores of 55 or higher on five exams |
120,058 |
91.7 |
31,431 |
86.2 |
General-education
students with five exams, at least two scores above 65, and no
score below 55 |
119,640 |
91.4 |
31,187 |
85.5 |
General-education students with five exams, at least three scores above 65, and no score below 55 |
118,248 |
90.3 |
30,337 |
83.2 |
General-education students with an average score of 65 or higher on five exams, at least three scores above 65, and no score below 55 |
116,630 |
89.1 |
29,179 |
80.0 |
General-education students with five exams, at least four scores above 65 and all scores above 55 |
114,081 |
87.1 |
27,927 |
76.6 |
General-education students with an average score of 65 or higher on five exams, at least four scores above 65 and all scores above 55 |
113,801 |
86.9 |
27,707 |
76.0 |
General-education
students with a score of 65 or higher on five
exams |
101,123 |
77.2 |
21,887 |
60.0 |
* Note that this represents only those
general-education students in the cohort that took exams. The total 2000 student cohort was 199,
312 students, of which 178,050 students were in general
education.
Attachment
B
DIPLOMA
REQUIREMENTS BASED ON PROPOSED REGENTS ACTION TO PHASE IN THE 65 GRADUATION
STANDARD ON REQUIRED REGENTS EXAMS
Entering
Freshman Class |
Local
Diploma Requirements |
Regents
Diploma Requirements |
Regents
Diploma with Advanced Designation
Requirements |
2005 |
Score
65 or above on 2 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 3
required Regents exams. Earn
22 units of credit. |
Score
65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
Score
65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
2006 |
Score
65 or above on 3 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 2
required Regents exams. Earn
22 units of credit. |
Score
65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
Score
65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
2007
|
Score
65 or above on 4 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 1
required Regents exam. Earn 22 units of credit |
Score
65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
Score
65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
2008
|
|
Score
65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
Score
65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of
credit. |
Note: The Regents Competency Test safety net
for students with disabilities will continue to be available for students
entering grade 9 prior to September 2010.
Students using this safety net will receive a local diploma. The low-pass option of scoring between
55-64 on the required Regents exams to learn a local diploma will continue to be
available for students with disabilities.