THE STATE
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 |
TO: |
The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents |
FROM: |
Rebecca H. Cort |
COMMITTEE: |
EMSC-VESID |
TITLE OF
ITEM: |
Amendment to the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported Employment Services |
DATE OF
SUBMISSION: |
February 27, 2004 |
PROPOSED
HANDLING: |
Approval |
RATIONALE FOR
ITEM: |
Required under the Rehabilitation Act of 1998, as amended |
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
Goals 3-6 |
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1998, as amended, the Amendment to the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported Employment Services, effective July 1, 2004, is presented for your approval. The attached report summarizes the content of the Amendment. The complete document is available in the Regents Office for your review. The draft Amendment was shared with you for your information in October 2003, prior to release for public comment.
Attachment
AMENDMENT
TO THE STATE PLAN
FOR
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND SUPPORTED
NEW
YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
OFFICE
OF VOCATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES FOR
INDIVIDUALS
WITH DISABILITIES
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK
Regents of The
University
Robert
M. Bennett, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. .......................................................................
Tonawanda
Adelaide
L. Sanford, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., P.D. ...............................................
Hollis
Diane
O’Neill McGivern,
B.S.N., M.A., Ph.D. ..............................................................
Staten
Island
Saul
B. Cohen, B.A.,
M.A., Ph.D............................................................................................
New
Rochelle
James
C. Dawson, A.A.,
B.A., M.S., Ph.D. ..........................................................................
Peru
Robert
M. Johnson, B.S.,
J.D. ...............................................................................................
Huntington
Anthony
S. Bottar, B.A.,
J.D. .............................................................................................
North
Syracuse
Merryl
H. Tisch, B.A., M.A.
...................................................................................................
New
York
Geraldine
D. Chapey, B.A.,
M.A., Ed.D...........................................................................
Belle
Harbor
Arnold
B. Gardner, B.A., LL.B...........................................................................................
Buffalo
Harry Phillips, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ......................................................................................
Hartsdale
Joseph
E. Bowman, Jr.,
B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D................................................
Albany
Lorraine
A. CortÉs-VÁzquez, B.A., M.P.A..................................................................
Bronx
James
R. Tallon, jr., B.A., M.A. ..........................................................................................
Binghamton
Milton
L. Cofield, b.s., m.b.A., Ph.D. ...............................................................................
Rochester
President of The University and
Commissioner of Education
Richard
P. Mills
Chief of
Staff
Counsel and Deputy Commissioner
for Legal Affairs
Kathy
A. Ahearn
Chief Operating Officer
Deputy
Commissioner for the Office of Management Services
Theresa
E. Savo
Deputy Commissioner for
Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with
Disabilities
Rebecca
H. cort
Coordinator, Policy, Planning and
Partnerships
Douglass
Bailey
Manager, VR Policy and
Partnerships
Judith
kleinberg
The
State Education Department does not discriminate on the basis of age, color,
religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national origin,
race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in
its educational programs, services and activities. Portions of this publication can be made
available in a variety of formats, including braille, large print or audio tape,
upon request. Inquiries concerning
this policy of nondiscrimination should be directed to the Department’s Office
for Diversity, Ethics, and Access, Room 530, Education Building, Albany, NY
12234. Requests for additional copies of
this publication may be made by contacting the Publications Sales Desk, Room
309, Education Building, Albany, NY 12234.
SUMMARY
OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE STATE PLAN FOR
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND SUPPORTED
EMPLOYMENT
SERVICES, EFFECTIVE JULY 1,
2004
The Rehabilitation Act, as amended, requires
that New York State prepare a State Plan on the same cycle as the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA). This document
informs the public of the Office of Vocational and Educational Services for
Individuals with Disabilities (VESID) goals, priorities and objectives in
providing vocational rehabilitation and supported employment services to
individuals with disabilities in New York State. This five-year document, entitled
State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported Employment Services,
Effective July 1, 2001, was previously submitted and approved by the
Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA). The Rehabilitation Act further requires
that each state annually amend its approved State Plan in specific areas as
requested. The Amendment to the
State Plan consists of specific attachments that must be updated annually as
required by RSA. The content and format of the Amendment to the State Plan are
based on the most recent guidance provided by RSA.
VESID, in conjunction with the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC),
developed the proposed Amendment to the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation
and Supported Employment Services, Effective July 1, 2004. The proposed Amendment to the State Plan
was used to solicit input and recommendations from the public on planned
activities related to the vocational rehabilitation of persons with disabilities
for the next year.
Additionally, VESID informed the public of a major effort it has
undertaken to assess our overall capacity for serving individuals with
disabilities. Called Designing Our Future, VESID is seeking to provide a quality
vocational rehabilitation system that continues to meet high standards while
ensuring fiscal accountability, fostering collaboration with state and community
partners and supporting personnel planning that allows for creative use of staff
skills and regional partnerships. VESID began informing the public of this
process at the first state plan public meeting held November 17 and will
continue gathering information from various constituencies throughout the first
half of 2004. The four points
around which Designing Our Future will be built are: obtaining more employment
for VESID consumers, enhancing collaboration among state and community entities,
technology advancement and identifying and utilizing professional
expertise.
The public comment period regarding the State Plan amendments extended
from November 17 through December 18, 2003.
Public
Meetings
To notify and inform the public about the town
meetings on the state plan, VESID mailed flyers that gave specific details on
the proposed Amendment including meeting dates, times and locations. The flyers
were sent to consumers, community agencies, schools, independent living centers,
and support groups. VESID also used the newsletters, Friday faxes, and internal
communication processes of several community rehabilitation providers to
advertise the proposed Amendment and town meetings.
VESID further
advertised the proposed Amendment and the town meetings through two VESID
websites. Using Internet access,
VESID created a Virtual Town Meeting site that was accessible to the public
seven days per week, 24 hours per day. The Virtual Town Meeting allowed
individuals to review the proposed Amendment and to electronically post their
comments.
The town meetings
were designed to provide ample opportunities for participants to review and
discuss their ideas about VESID’s state plan, policy, and future direction,
including order of selection, supported employment, the comprehensive system of
personnel development, VESID's annual estimates of individuals to be served, and
evaluation and report of progress.
At each meeting, VESID provided a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed
Amendment, including Designing Our Future. The SRC led the public discussion to
solicit recommendations. VESID staff facilitated the discussion, but public
participants remained free to offer comments or recommendations on any part of
the State Plan and its process. A total of 82 people attended the five meetings.
VESID included for public
discussion an attachment on Order of Selection. By introducing this attachment
during the public comment period, VESID is alerting the public that VESID may
not have either the necessary funds or staff to serve all eligible individuals
and so must prioritize by category the people VESID can serve first. As we do not anticipate the need to
enter an order of selection, we will not submit the attachment as part of the
final plan. Though VESID is not submitting the Order of Selection attachment at
this time, providing this information to the public for review fulfills
statutory requirements regarding public notification. Should an Order of Selection become
necessary during the year, this Amendment to the State Plan can be submitted
with no further public input.
The comments and recommendations received during the public comment
period were reviewed for incorporation into VESID’s Amendment to the State
Plan. Comments that were received,
but did not directly alter the Amendment, are being shared with VESID leadership
for consideration. Most comments received reflected recommendations for
Designing Our Future. These have
been shared with the Designing our Future steering
committee.
The following attachments describe VESID’s
plans, policies and activities in a number of required areas. Highlights of the Amendment to the
State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported Employment Services,
Effective July 1, 2004
include:
·
Summary of Input and
Recommendations of the State Rehabilitation Council; Response of the Designated
State Unit; and Explanation for Rejection of Input or Recommendations:
Attachment 4.2(C)
Summarizes the
advice of the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC) on the State Plan, policy
development and general comments. VESID’s responses to SRC are also
included. Since this is the
Council's recommendation to VESID, it reflects only the Council's motions and
does not go to the public for comment.
·
Comprehensive System of Personnel
Development (CSPD)
Describes VESID’s activities that ensure an adequate supply of qualified
rehabilitation professionals in conformance with its CSPD. The CSPD calls for VESID to use the
highest national standard, Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC), as the goal
in recruitment/retention of counselors.
Comments:
Public concerns were raised about the declining number of VESID counselors due
to retirement and attrition, and the rising counselor caseloads. It was
suggested that VESID’s hiring practices be broadened beyond hiring only
Certified Rehabilitation Counselors.
Response: VESID,
by federal law and regulation, must seek to hire vocational rehabilitation
counselors who meet highest professional standards. In New York State, that
requires VESID to hire vocational rehabilitation counseling professionals who
have or are eligible to obtain certification as a Certified Rehabilitation
Counselor (CRC). No change to attachment.
·
Goals and Plans for Distribution of Title VI, Part B
Funds (Supported
Employment)
This attachment indicates that VESID plans to continue to fund supported
employment services using Federal VIB and other funds.
Comments:
none
Response:
No change to attachment.
·
Annual Estimates of Individuals to be
Served
VESID estimates that, during Federal Fiscal Year 2003-2004, 36,900
individuals with significant or most significant disabilities will be eligible
for VESID services.
Comments:
The SRC raised concerns about program changes made by the New York State Office
of Mental Health, through its Personalized Recovery Oriented Services (PROS)
programs. The SRC expressed concern that the PROS programs may increase the
number of consumers who seek service from VESID. As such, the council thought the VESID
estimate should be higher.
Response:
VESID will monitor the PROS activity, but based on historical trends and data,
believes that the annual estimate is a reasonable and fair
estimate.
No change to attachment.
·
Order of Selection (OOS): Attachment
4.12(c)(2)(A)
Describes how VESID will provide services if the determination is made
that it cannot provide the full range of rehabilitation services to all eligible
individuals. It includes the order to be followed in selecting eligible
individuals to be provided vocational rehabilitation services; a justification
of that OOS; the service and outcome goals and the time within which these goals
may be achieved for individuals in each priority category within the order.
Comments: VESID received a variety of comments from the
public recommending that VESID not
go to an OOS.
Response: The comments and recommendations have been forwarded to
the VESID policy unit and to leadership for further consideration. VESID will do
whatever it can to avoid an OOS. This attachment is not being submitted with the
final State Plan.
·
Evaluation and Report of Progress in Achieving
Identified Goals and Priorities and Use of Title l Funds for Innovation and
Expansion Activities
Describes VESID’s progress in achieving the goals and priorities agreed
to with the State Rehabilitation Council.
Comments:
No comments were received on this attachment.
Response: No
change to attachment.
Summary
of Input and Recommendations of the State Rehabilitation Council; Response of
the Designated State Unit; and Explanation for Rejection of Input or
Recommendations: Attachment 4.2(C)
Over the last several years, VESID and the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC) have sought to work more closely and cooperatively in setting the policy direction and the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services for eligible New York State VESID consumers. VESID and SRC developed a process that reflects a team approach to new policy development in which the appropriate VESID units (policy, training, operations and technology) work together with SRC members to assure full communication on policy issues while adhering to an efficient policy development and implementation process. This process has allowed SRC and VESID to jointly develop the State Plan and VESID policy.
The table below provides the SRC’s recommendations and VESID's response to each recommendation.
State Rehabilitation
Council (SRC) Recommendations |
VESID
Response |
STATE
PLAN | |
Change the format of the State Plan Town Hall meetings to:
Target audiences, based on “timely issues” and go where they are, e.g., for consumer issues seek input from self-advocate meetings, for teacher input go to schools and colleges, for employers seek out locations where they will be, including employment fairs, provider meetings, etc. |
VESID can hold town meetings on the State Plan throughout the year. However, VESID is statutorily required to provide the public with the required State Plan attachments and to solicit public discussion on those attachments. VESID can, however, coordinate the State Plan meetings with other venues. VESID will increase efforts to participate in existing meetings and forums and to incorporate feedback gathered throughout the year. |
Gather input (on the State Plan) throughout the year. The report has to be written in the winter but input can be gathered any time. |
VESID can gather input throughout the year. SRC should be aware that vocational rehabilitation State agencies often must wait for policy directives governing the State Plan content from the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA). If we have meetings earlier in the year, it is conceivable that we would have to re-hold them when new policy directives on the State Plan are issued from RSA. That is both time consuming and costly. |
Continue the practice of making available a virtual town meeting on the web site. |
VESID will continue to post both the State Plan and town meeting on the web site. |
Use
the State Plan as a way to do outreach to individuals who might be
interested in becoming members of the State Rehabilitation Council. Have applications
available.
|
This has been incorporated in State Plan presentations. Having membership applications available is a good addition to this effort and VESID will do so. |
Share all comments received as part of the State Plan and provide feedback to those who make comment. |
Because most of the comments VESID receives come from open discussion at public forums, it is not possible to provide individual feedback. During the past several years, VESID has summarized public comments and has posted that summary with VESID’s response on the VESID web site. We will continue to do this. |
The Council strongly opposes an order of selection and encourages VESID to take measures to ensure that an order of selection is not implemented. |
VESID agrees and will continue to look at how resources and staff are allocated to continue to be able to serve all eligible consumers. |
Council members have expressed concern that changes by the Office of Mental Health in its Personalized Recovery Oriented Services (PROS) program may increase the numbers of consumers who seek service from VESID. The Council requests that the expected increase in numbers of consumers be reflected in the State Plan; the overall issue be adequately monitored; and the results of the monitoring activity be shared with funding sources, including members of the Legislature, if appropriate. |
At this time VESID does not expect a dramatic increase in the numbers of consumers with mental illness seeking VESID services and has been working closely with the Office of Mental Health regarding the initiation of PROS.
However, VESID will monitor the activities related to PROS and will share the results of this monitoring activity with all appropriate parties. |
VESID goals and performance indicators need to be revisited and aligned more appropriately to current circumstances, i.e., staffing levels, employment opportunities, New York State budget issues. |
VESID is revising its goals and key performance indicators. SRC and other stakeholder input will be sought regarding the targets and benchmarks for each indicator. |
ADDITIONAL ADVICE PROVIDED
THROUGHOUT LAST YEAR | |
The State Rehabilitation Council believes VESID’s capacity to serve all eligible individuals is potentially being compromised by the number of cuts in staffing. SRC requests that VESID provide an analysis of staffing in the District Offices and provide information to demonstrate that staffing levels and service provision options are adequate to provide appropriate service to consumers. |
VESID has undertaken a major effort, Designing Our Future, which will assess our overall capacity and needs and will establish creative solutions to assure continuation of high-quality services.
Analysis of staff will be part of this effort and shared with SRC. |
VESID should ensure that staff are well trained, in a timely manner, about Medicaid Buy-in and what it means to consumers and VESID in terms of implementation. |
VESID agrees. Several specific activities are already under way to assure that staff are trained and that information is available at VESID offices regarding the Medicaid Buy-in. |
VESID should ensure that employers are made aware of Medicaid Buy-ins. |
VESID will work with others responsible for dissemination of information on the Medicaid Buy-in to assure that our efforts are coordinated with the overall training effort. |
VESID must be more visible to employers. One suggestion is that VESID participate more fully in the Business Leadership Network (BLN). |
VESID will share its current employer information with the SRC. We look forward to working with the SRC and many employer networks to increase VESID’s visibility with employers. |
VESID should outreach to colleges and gather more input from that arena, particularly as the State Education Department has a goal to increase access to and success of students with disabilities in postsecondary education. |
The New York State Education Department (SED) has developed a postsecondary education work plan. A future Request For Proposal is being planned to identify best practices to increase access to and success of these students. Technical assistance will be available to help institutions of higher education meet the Regents priority goal of increasing access and success of students with disabilities, which is now a part of the institutions’ master plans. |
VESID should explore funding opportunities- both an assessment of available money and development of new funding streams- to support students with disabilities in postsecondary education. |
There is a New York State legislative bill that has been introduced in both the Assembly and the Senate to establish a funding program for the improvement of disability services at institutions of higher education. VESID and the Offices of Higher Education and Professions are gathering input from the four higher education sectors to develop an advocacy plan for widespread legislative support. |
The Council believes that overall supported employment is in jeopardy. VESID should undertake an analysis of supported employment and its future. This would require a systemic plan for re-energizing the State’s commitment to supported employ-ment. The Council recommends that parents of school-age children (those who might in the future need supported employment) be brought into this issue to assist with garnering support, federal and State, for the supported employment program. |
VESID is reviewing hundreds of applications for new supported employment contracts which are effective July 1, 2004. Those applications reflect a high interest on the part of providers to maintain and expand supported employment services. VESID agrees to the need to expand the involvement of parents to provide additional support for the appropriate utilization of supported employment as a transition mechanism. |
One area that requires improvement for us as a Council, as well as for VESID, is consumer involvement. The Council hopes to work closely with VESID in the near future to discuss opportunities to more effectively engage consumers. The Council must have ongoing input and feedback from consumers if it is to appropriately represent issues of concern. |
VESID agrees that consumer involvement is crucial. We look forward to working with the Council to ascertain the Council’s specific concerns and recommendations. VESID is also looking forward to the Council’s involvement as we go forward with designing the future of the vocational rehabilitation system. |
The Council is very pleased that the State Education Department and the State Workforce Investment Board (SWIB) have adopted the goal of increasing the rate of employment of individuals with disabilities. However, at this time, we call upon VESID to work with us to set some specific interim goals and measurements. We must begin to track our actual progress together in meeting the global goal. |
VESID looks forward to working with other offices within SED, the SRC and the SWIB to establish goals that can be agreed upon by each of these entities. VESID will continue to work with SRC to find solutions that will increase the rate of employment for individuals with disabilities. |
Comprehensive System of Personnel
Development: Attachment 4.11(b)
VESID's
Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (CSPD) was jointly developed by a
work group that included VESID management and professional staff, a
representative of the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC), and professional staff
from the Commission for the Blind and Visually Handicapped
(CBVH).
VESID will ensure an
adequate supply of qualified rehabilitation professionals by tracking all staff
and working to meet the needs of consumers by providing the most qualified
rehabilitation professionals. The Microsoft ACCESS program is being used to
monitor the CSPD. VESID also tracks
all its personnel through two data systems. The first is the New York State
Education Department's mainframe computer-based personnel system, which
generates a monthly report describing the status of staff items, grade level,
item numbers, position classification and pay scale. The other system is the
Operations Database, a VESID-maintained system that includes Central Office and
District Office personnel information by appointment type, date of appointment,
grade level, pay level, and personnel movement such as time worked and
resignations. The Operations Database allows immediate access to personnel data
that are VESID specific.
As of August 2003, VESID's figures in regard
to adequate supply of qualified rehabilitation professionals are as
follows:
Full-Time Equivalent Vocational
Rehabilitation Counselors (VRCs) |
345 |
VRCs not meeting CSPD
standards |
49 |
VESID Active
Caseload |
60,570 |
Ratio of counselors to
consumers |
1 counselor to every
177 consumers |
Anticipated VRCs who VESID will need
over the next two years due to loss of current
VRCs |
50 |
COORDINATION
OF CSPD WITH THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT
(IDEA)
VESID administers
both special education and vocational rehabilitation programs. The CSPD
functions for vocational rehabilitation are being carried out by VESID's
Vocational Rehabilitation Training Unit, in collaboration with all other VESID
organizational units. VESID recognizes the need to address cross-system concerns
that affect all staff. For example, the coordination of meaningful transition
services from school age to postsecondary settings remains one of the most
challenging aspects of program delivery and is a high priority area for
vocational rehabilitation and special education collaboration. Several years
ago, a joint memorandum of agreement was developed that outlined roles and
responsibilities between vocational rehabilitation and special education. The
State Education Department and CVBH also share a memorandum of understanding
regarding the transition of young adults with visual impairments to employment.
VESID and CBVH plan to continue their relationship within the CSPD context and
other matters related to IDEA. In addition, VESID
continues to partner with other agencies to serve consumers, without overlapping
our services.
During 2002, in response to the continued need to assist more young
people to successfully transition from school to careers or further education,
VESID hired 29 counselors and counselor assistants, with IDEA funds, to work
specifically with schools and students with disabilities who are transitioning
to adult roles. On October 2002,
these staff received specialized training in transition and working with
students with disabilities. VESID continues to review the results of this effort
to assure that students with disabilities are able to more successfully attain
high-quality employment and postsecondary educational programs leading to career
opportunities.
The chart below indicates that new referrals for youth (ages 14-21) have
increased, as have the number of youth served and the school districts with
which VESID is working. VESID continues to work closely with schools to enable
the smooth transition of students with disabilities from school to
work.
|
State Fiscal
Year 2001-2002 |
State Fiscal
Year 2002-2003 |
New youth
referrals |
9,947 |
11,432 |
Youth Served |
25,176 |
27,733 |
Youth employed as a result of VESID
services |
3,205 |
3,240 |
School Districts whose students are in
VESID caseload |
569 |
604 |
School buildings within school
districts |
977 |
1,121 |
Description of and information on institutions of
higher education within the State that are preparing rehabilitation
professionals
There are seven institutions of higher education in New York State
accredited by the Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) that prepare
vocational rehabilitation professionals. VESID is working with these
institutions to develop a process for the recruitment of students from diverse
populations, and to establish a curriculum based on best practices, research,
and development trends.
VESID has collected the following data
regarding the CORE accredited institutions:
Number of students enrolled in seven
CORE accredited institutions (2003-2004) |
245 |
Number of students identified with
disability |
40 |
Number of students identified as
non-white |
157 |
Number of students who graduated in
2002 |
81 |
Plan for recruitment, preparation, and
retention of qualified personnel
As a function of VESID's CSPD plan to recruit, prepare, and retain
qualified personnel, VESID has made significant progress in many areas. While
some of these innovations will not be fully implemented because of the current
budget restrictions in New York State, they have been developed and approved,
and will be operational as soon as possible.
·
SED has
implemented an agency-wide Diversity Plan that specifies a process for the
recruitment and selection of qualified candidates and is designed to support
appropriate outreach to underrepresented populations as a required component of
all recruitment efforts. The need to address diversity issues is a critical
consideration of VESID's CSPD.
However, recruitment visits to colleges with significant enrollment of
students from minority populations will be suspended until the current hiring
freeze and travel restrictions are lifted.
All VESID staff participates in diversity training to enhance awareness
to issues of diversity in its broadest sense (ethnic, racial, cultural, gender,
etc.). During the past year VESID was able to hire five counselors under the New
York.
·
Approval is in
place to utilize the State Civil Service Law, section 55b/c program, that
encourages public employment of individuals with
disabilities.
·
Approval is in
place that offers up to 15 paid internship positions for individuals in their
second year of a master's degree program.
This program will begin as soon as budget considerations allow. In the interim, unpaid internships are
available.
·
Approval is in
place to retain a pool of VRC positions to be used for a two-month overlap of
new staff and retiring counselors, providing for training and caseload
transition. This initiative will be
operational when the current NYS
“freeze” on hiring of new staff is lifted.
·
A proposal to
increase the salaries of all vocational rehabilitation counselors' (VRCs) and
counselor assistants to keep salaries competitive with the private sector has
been forwarded to the NYS Department of Civil Service for review and approval.
·
VESID has
implemented the Long Term Training Grant for CSPD, which covers the cost of
college courses required for VESID VRCs to meet the Certified Rehabilitation
Counselor (CRC) and CSPD standards. At the end of the 2002-2003 academic year,
two VRC staff graduated and met the CRC requirements. In the current 2003-2004
academic year, 28 VRC staff are attending four New York State CORE institutions
and one out-of-state distance learning CORE institution. The VESID Personnel
Development Team provides mentoring to Long Term Training Grant
awardees.
·
All
applications to the Long Term Training Grant for college tuition support have
been approved, so there has been no need to implement the approved strategy for
prioritizing applications. Nearly
all applicants are completing their schoolwork on their own time, necessitating
few requests for reduced work time.
·
A distance
learning cooperative to provide ongoing educational opportunities for those who
do not meet the highest standards is now being implemented by two schools,
Syracuse University and City University of New York's Hunter College, and
programs are being developed with two additional schools. Our intent is to
develop such plans with all seven CORE institutions in New York
State.
·
VESID has
continued to provide ongoing updated training opportunities to all VRC
staff. VESID personnel will continue to receive
appropriate and adequate training through a system of staff development. VESID's
Vocational Rehabilitation Operations Training Unit has primary responsibility to
ensure that all personnel employed by VESID are appropriately and adequately
trained and prepared to provide quality services to internal and external
customers.
·
VESID has
continued to partner with CBVH and maintain relationships with New York
State-based federally sponsored initiatives.
·
Relationships
continue with New York State-based federally sponsored initiatives, such as the
Regional Rehabilitation Training Center (RRTC) on Brain Injury at Mt. Sinai;
RRTC on Disability and Employment Policy at Cornell University; the two Parent
Training and Outreach Centers; and the long term training grant program at
Hunter College.
·
Access is
provided to training in sign language for interested
counselors.
·
VESID
maintains an extensive on-line manual and web-based resources that provide easy
access for counselors to VESID policies, procedures, technical assistance
briefs, federal laws and federal regulations, as well as disability and
employment-related information.
The New York State Education Department/VESID will hire Vocational
Rehabilitation Counseling Professionals who have or are eligible to obtain
certification as a Certified Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC).
If VESID is unable to recruit individuals who meet the CRC standard
because the unique and specific service needs of a region limit availability of
qualified applicants, VESID will hire individuals in the following priority
order:
·
Master's degree in
Rehabilitation Counseling or a closely related field and no
CRC.
·
Bachelor's degree (VR
related).
·
Bachelor's degree with
specialized skills.
Hiring preference
will be given to individuals who meet national certification
standards.
In addition,
outreach efforts for recruitment will be made through disability groups and
associations (in accordance with the SED/VESID Diversity Plan) serving minority
populations. VESID will also work with institutions of higher education to
expand their student recruitment efforts to reach students with diverse
backgrounds. VESID will work with the New York State Department of Civil Service
to review, as necessary, VESID's standard for hiring qualified VRCs based on
agency and federal regulation and revise existing employment descriptions and
standards to meet the above policy.
VRCs hired prior to July
1, 2000 |
VRCs hired after July 1,
2000 |
VESID will provide
training and other incentives to each VRC, as mutually agreed, to move
toward the standard. Support will be provided through In Service Training
funds and the Long Term Training Grant. |
VESID will develop a
strategy to ensure that individuals who are hired after July 1, 2000 and
do not meet the national standard will obtain that standard.
|
While it is the intent of VESID to hire and retain employees who meet the
national standard, in some instances VESID may be unable to hire vocational
rehabilitation counselors who meet the standard. For example, in order to hire
VRCs who meet the unique needs of regional offices (e.g., expertise in Spanish,
communication skills, or expertise with persons who are severely disabled),
VESID may need to recruit personnel without CRC certification. In these cases,
VESID will develop a strategy to ensure that those individuals meet the national
standard.
VESID will address current and projected vocational rehabilitation
personnel needs by ensuring that all its personnel will be adequately trained.
To accomplish this goal, the following activities have been and will continue to
be supported for employees:
·
In-service training funds
provide for attendance at workshops, formal course work, agency developed and
conducted training sessions, and Rehabilitation Research Continuing Education
Program (RRCEP) developed or sponsored training sessions. Training is offered in
the fields of counseling rehabilitation, medical aspects of disabilities, job
placement, rehabilitation technology, diversity, choice, Americans with
Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, and other topics
related to the field of vocational rehabilitation. All employees have access to
these training opportunities.
·
VESID will continue to support
and provide training on rehabilitation technology, and will work with RRCEP to
develop relevant training programs.
·
VESID distributes information
received from a variety of sources including the National Clearinghouse of
Rehabilitation Materials, Arkansas Research and Training Center, Institute of
Rehabilitation Issues, and many other professional, educational and private
sources.
·
VESID provides ongoing
training to all VRCs regarding policy and procedural changes that have resulted
from the 1998 Rehabilitation Act Amendments, 2001 Federal Vocational
Rehabilitation regulations and other federal and state laws and regulations
relevant to the vocational rehabilitation process. Training provided in FFY 2003
to date includes: transition training, policies on Training at a College or
University, Order of Selection, Significance of Disability, and Due Process;
Social Security Benefits and Ticket to Work. VESID also provided or sponsored
training to staff on World of Work, Ethical Issues, Disability Awareness,
Understanding Substance Abuse, Impact of Employment and Benefits and Medicaid,
Business for Self, Learning Disabilities, and Temporary Assistance to Needy
Families. Training was also
provided on supervisory procedures.
·
VESID is
implementing a cross-training pilot program between VESID and the New York State
Office of Mental Health (OMH) called RESPECT. RESPECT stands for responsive,
encouraging, sensitive, perceptive, empowering, caring and thoughtful. Respect
International is an advocacy, humanitarian, and educational non-profit
organization, created out of the need of persons with psychiatric challenges to
be treated with respect. The program will identify action steps that local
agencies and counselors can take to enhance collaborative vocationally related
services to individuals with psychiatric disabilities. In addition to VESID and
OMH, local county mental health agencies and the New York Association of
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services will participate and together develop local
action plans for improving vocational services to this group. This is the
culmination of lengthy negotiations among the state and local partners striving
to develop better working relationships regionally.
Personnel to address individual
communication needs
To ensure that VESID adequately provides services to consumers who are
not English proficient, have a cognitive disability or are deaf, VESID has
professional staff able to communicate in the native language of individuals who
are non-English speaking or who use other modes of communication, such as sign
language. When such staff are not available, VESID contracts with outside
agencies and individuals for interpreter or communication services. VESID also ensures that VRCs are aware
of how an individual's cognitive disability might affect his or her ability to
participate in the vocational rehabilitation process.
VESID requires the use of Certified or State-approved interpreters for
the deaf when sign language interpreter services are required in the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services.
VESID also requires a specific communication skill level for vocational
rehabilitation staff working with Spanish-speaking consumers. VESID will
continue to use these standards and make adjustments when appropriate.
Annual
Estimates of Individuals to be Served and Costs of Service: Attachment
4.12(b)
VESID estimates that during Federal Fiscal
Year 2004-2005, 35,280 individuals with significant or most significant
disabilities will be found eligible for VESID services. This number reflects a
continuation of historical trends.
Based on historical data reported to the Rehabilitation Services
Administration (RSA), VESID estimates, under Title l, that it will serve 110,000
individuals, at a total estimated cost of 195 million dollars. VESID estimates
that of the 110,000 individuals served, approximately 6,700 individuals will be
receiving supported employment services.
An estimated 900 of those individuals receiving supported employment
services will be served using Title VlB funds.
Goals
and Plans for Distribution of Title VI, Part B Funds: Attachment
4.12(c)(3)
Federal Title VIB funds for supported
employment services were initially used to develop model programs to determine
the most effective structure for supported employment and to determine what
types of services and supports work best with different populations. However, Title VIB resources do
not provide sufficient funds to create additional new programs. At present, Title VIB funds represent
approximately 7.6 percent of the total funds VESID uses for intensive supported
employment services. VESID will continue the operation of the projects
established under Title VIB support.
Title VIB funds will continue to be used to supplement, but not supplant,
Title I funds.
Supported Employment
Programs
Providers for supported employment programs
were originally selected through an interagency competitive Request for Proposal
(RFP) issued in the fall of 1987, through processes described in earlier State
Plan submissions. Final selections
from among the top scoring agencies were made based on diversity of population,
diversity of geographic location, and model or approach
used.
VESID issued a new application for all
Intensive Supported Employment services and for all VESID-funded extended
services on July 1, 2002. That
application was the result of extensive negotiation with providers, advocacy
groups and the State’s fiscal authorities, as coordinated by VESID. VESID chose not to implement the results
of that application process because the scoring and selection criteria resulted
in very significant shifts in service delivery and in gaps in service
delivery. Accordingly, VESID has
sought and received permission to extend its current supported employment
contracts for one final year and, during that interval, will design and
implement an application process which meets both programmatic and
administrative requirements. That
application, released the end of calendar year 2003, will result in new
contracts effective July 1, 2004.
VESID combines Title VIB and Section 110
funds to provide supported employment services to individuals with the most
significant disabilities.
Disabilities served in supported employment services include all
disabilities within those served by VESID and Commission for the Blind and
Visually Handicapped (CBVH). VESID
maintains agreements (Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Integrated
Employment Implementation Plan, Chapter 515 of the Laws of 1992) with the Office
of Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities (OMRDD), Office of Mental
Health (OMH) and CBVH which define VESID as the sole source for intensive
funding. Program evaluation
includes reviews of statistical data from interagency quarterly report
submissions as well as on-site reviews, including consumer interviews.
Successful and exemplary practices have been disseminated to staff of the State
agencies involved and to other project sites. Each of VESID’s Title VIB programs is
designed to:
·
provide
services to individuals with the most significant disabilities who might not be
traditionally considered appropriate for competitive
employment;
·
develop
techniques for unserved and underserved populations, such as persons with
traumatic brain injuries, deafness, multiple disabilities, autism, severe
learning disabilities, and mental illness;
·
develop
quality programs that could be used for replication purposes;
and
·
establish
successful supported employment programs that will provide technical assistance
to future similar programs.
Providers’ performance and costs are reviewed at
least annually. Budget
renegotiations occur based on overall performance, including performance on
projected outcomes agreed to by VESID and the provider.
VESID counselors perform case management duties for
each consumer supported through Title VIB, including developing the
Individualized Plan for Employment and monitoring its implementation. Since the programs funded under Title
VIB represent services to previously underserved individuals, every effort is
made to improve the project's performance through continuing technical
assistance and service delivery improvements. The following chart summarizes
VESID's current level of federal expenditure in supported employment, the number
of programs and individuals served, types of disabilities served in programs and
types of supported employment models.
2002/2003 SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
Federal Resources for Supported
Employment FFY 2002 |
| |||||||||
Funding
Source |
Number
of Programs |
Consumers to
be Rehabilitated |
Types of
Disabilities |
Models |
| |||||
Title
VIB CBVH
Contracted |
6 |
30 |
blind, deaf blind,
developmental disabilities with blindness |
individual enclave mobile
crew |
| |||||
Section
110 Contracted
|
153 |
3,561 |
developmental
disabilities, severe mental illness, traumatic brain injury, severe
physical disabilities, deafness, multiple
disabilities, autism
|
individual enclave mobile
crew
|
| |||||
Title VIB models and
expand service delivery
|
13 |
356 |
| |||||||
|
Total Federal
Resources (contracted only)
|
172
|
3,947 |
|
| |||||
Evaluation
and Report of Progress in Achieving Identified Goals and Priorities and Use of
Title I Funds for Innovation and Expansion Activities: Attachment
4.12(e)
Section 106
of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended in 1998, requires the Rehabilitation
Services Administration (RSA) Commissioner to evaluate state vocational
rehabilitation (VR) agencies based on their performance on evaluation standards
and indicators. These standards
were developed and published as 34 CFR 361.81 on June 5, 2000, and have been
applied officially to state VR agency performance results beginning with federal
fiscal year (FFY) 2000 data.
Performance on these standards is being used to determine whether a state
VR agency is complying substantially with the provisions of its state plan. States that do not meet the performance
criteria will be required, jointly with RSA, to develop a program improvement
plan.
The following results are based on the most recent data available on the
federal performance indicators and the current published goals and
priorities. The innovation and
expansion activities undertaken with Title I funds contributed to these levels
of achievement.
VESID Goal: Individuals with disabilities will
participate successfully in postsecondary education.
Results: The
number of self-identified students with disabilities enrolled in institutions of
higher education in New York State has increased steadily over the last nine
years, from fewer than 25,000 in 1993 to 36,249 in 2001. With higher standards
in place in schools and more students with disabilities ready and able to access
postsecondary education, there is still a continuing need for campuses to be
prepared to serve increasing numbers of students with disabilities. Increasing percentages of special
education graduates are planning postsecondary education. Of the 15,863 students
with disabilities who completed high school in 2002, 48.1 percent had plans to
pursue a four-year, two-year, or other postsecondary education program. This
rate is 3.9 percentage points higher than the rate for 2000-2001. Postsecondary
education represents graduate, bachelor, associate, and non-degree colleges, as
well as business and trade schools.
The number of Individuals with disabilities
funded by VESID in postsecondary education programs has increased from 12,299
students in FFY 1999 to 12,601 students in FFY 2002.
The gap between
rates of all associate degree candidates and associate degree candidates with
disabilities is getting smaller. In FFY 2001, 23.9 percent of full-time, first
time entrants into associate degree programs graduated within three years while
23.2 percent of students with disabilities did the same. For the second
consecutive year, the success rate for students with disabilities in
baccalaureate programs has actually surpassed that for all students. Non-disabled students had a 58.3 percent
graduation rate for baccalaureate degrees while students with disabilities had a
60.6 percent graduation rate.
In federal fiscal year 2002, the number of
individuals who obtained employment after receiving funding for postsecondary
education increased by 2.0 percentage points from the previous year. While
increasing percentages of placements in competitive employment have resulted in
higher average wages for all consumers, the average wage for consumers who
attended postsecondary programs continues to be higher. In FFY 2002, the average starting salary
for consumers who attended postsecondary education programs was $10.75 per hour
as compared to the $8.64 per hour average salary for consumers during the same
time frame who did not pursue postsecondary education.
VESID Goal: Individuals with disabilities will be
employed in integrated work settings.
The Rehabilitation Services Administration
(RSA) has established seven national standards and indicators for state
vocational rehabilitation programs. Third year data for these indicators are
presented below.
Results: In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2002, the
number of individuals placed in jobs decreased slightly from the previous year.
Performance Indicator 1.1; Increase in
individuals achieving an employment outcome after receiving vocational
rehabilitation services from VESID. This data only includes data reported for
individuals with disabilities placed in integrated settings. VESID had a slight
decrease in the number of individuals achieving an employment outcome for FFY
2002. In spite of severe economic
restrictions and loss of staff across the State, the number of employment
outcomes declined by only 421 placements, going from 14,995 employment outcomes
in FFY 2001 to 14,574 employment outcomes in FFY 2002.
This slight decrease is reflective of many
factors. Vocational rehabilitation placements are affected by the overall
economic climate, and the recent economic downturn has depressed the
availability of jobs available to vocational rehabilitation consumers. The
continued high numbers of retirements among VESID counseling and other staff,
and significant state and federal fiscal constraints, have also contributed to
this decrease in placements.
Performance Indicator 1.2;
Percentage of individuals exiting the vocational rehabilitation program who
achieve an employment outcome.
Using the revised definition of employment outcome, the percentage of
individuals with disabilities who achieved employment after receiving vocational
rehabilitation services from VESID in FFY 2002 is 60.0 percent, exceeding the
national standard of 55.8 percent by 4.2 percent. Beginning in FFY 2002,
individuals placed in non-integrated settings were not recognized as employment
outcomes.
Performance Indicator 1.3;
Percentage of individuals achieving an employment outcome who earn at least
minimum wage. For FFY 2002, 91.0 percent of individuals obtaining employment
through VESID earned at or above minimum wage, far exceeding the national
benchmark standard of 72.6 percent.
Performance Indicator 1.4; Percentage of
individuals having significant disabilities who achieved competitive
employment. Individuals are
considered to have a significant disability when they have a physical or mental
impairment which seriously limits one or two functional capacities such as
mobility, communication, self-care, self-direction, interpersonal skills,
cognition, work tolerance, or work skills and whose vocational rehabilitation
will require multiple vocational rehabilitation services over an extended period
of time. VESID assisted
substantially greater percentages of individuals with significant disabilities
to achieve competitive employment compared to the national standard. For FFY
2002, 94.9 percent of the individuals obtaining employment through VESID earning
at least minimum wage, had significant disabilities. The national benchmark
standard is 62.4 percent.
Performance Indicator 1.5; Average hourly
earnings of individuals employed through VESID who earn at least minimum wage
compared to the average hourly earnings of all employed individuals in the
State. For FFY 2002, the ratio of hourly earnings
for VESID consumers to all employed individuals in the State was .41. VESID
results for this standard remain below the national benchmark, which is set at a
ratio of .52. This ratio reflects
the relationship of hourly wages earned by individuals at the time of closure
(typically 90 days after attaining employment) to the average hourly wage for
all workers in the State.
The benchmark ratio of .52, which is set at just above half of the
overall hourly wage, reflects that vocational rehabilitation consumers often use
vocational rehabilitation services after very little prior work experience, and
are at the beginning of their careers. The standard is a statewide ratio, which
in New York State is significantly affected by earnings in the Borough of
Manhattan. Outside the
Borough of Manhattan, VESID hourly wages exceed the national benchmark
standard.
Performance Indicator 1.6;
Percentage increase of individuals who report their own income as largest single
source of economic support from the time of application for VESID services to
the time of successful closure in employment with earnings of at least minimum
wage. In FFY 2002 62.8 percent of individuals with disabilities reported
their own earnings as the largest single source of support from the time of
application to successful closure. VESID's outcomes exceed the national
benchmark, which is 53 percent.
Performance Indicator 2.1; Comparison of
service rate for individuals from minority backgrounds compared with that for
individuals from non-minority backgrounds.
This indicator measures the rate at which individuals with disabilities
from minority and non-minority backgrounds receive services. In FFY 2002,
minority individuals with disabilities received vocational rehabilitation
services at a rate of 88 for every 100 (.88) non-minority individuals. VESID
continues to exceed the national standard on this federal indicator. The
national standard ratio is .80.
VESID Goal: All services for which VESID has
responsibility will be cost-effective.
Results: In FFY 2002, the cost of services, which
include all costs associated with purchased, direct and administrative services,
has decreased from $1,826 in FFY 2001 to $1,705 in FFY 2002. This represents a
6.6 percent overall decrease in the costs of services. In FFY 2002, the salaries of individuals
with disabilities placed in jobs by VESID represented $215 million in annualized
first-year earnings.
VESID Goal: All services for which VESID has
responsibility will meet high standards and continuously
improve.
Results: VESID has evaluated its performance against
the RSA quality performance indicators as noted above. VESID also hosted
consumer focus groups and surveyed responses to gather information on consumer
satisfaction. Consumers who attended forums in each of VESID's District Offices
and who replied to a statewide mail survey provided feedback on six key points
in VESID's service delivery process. The six key points to consumer satisfaction
are: timeliness of services, courtesy and responsiveness, initial contacts and
application, individualized employment plan, training, and job placement.
Consumer response was very favorable and also provided information in which
VESID can improve, particularly in the area of job placement.
A survey conducted in 2001-2002 indicated an
overall satisfaction rate with VESID vocational rehabilitation services of 89
percent while 91 percent of consumers who attended forums responded favorably
when asked if they would return to VESID or recommend a friend or family member
to VESID for vocational rehabilitation services.
Continuous Quality
Improvement
VESID remains committed to continuous
quality improvement in vocational rehabilitation services. Each of the cost savings measures that
have been instituted to date is being evaluated in terms of the cost
effectiveness and the impact on consumers and potential consumers served. Those measures that may have a direct
impact on access or services will be refashioned to maintain high quality while
being cost effective to the overall system.
Continued budget constraints, including
staffing decreases due to the State hiring freeze, make it imperative that we
seriously address new and different ways to accomplish our mission. In order to maintain and improve the
quality of services and outcomes, VESID will address new ways to structure and
deliver vocational rehabilitation services. Using data resulting from cost-effective
measures already taken and input from a wide range of stakeholders and staff,
VESID will set goals related to areas of service identified as high priority for
change and innovation. All aspects
of service delivery will be open for potential positive change. This may include, for example, locations
where services are delivered, entities that deliver services, case flow and
supervision, policy changes or changes in funding mechanisms.